JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 5, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Edgar Mosquera Gomez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por cuanto órdenes impartidas no generan una duda objetiva y razonable sobre el alcance de la medida que allí se tomó
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración a la sentencia T-147/20.

Encontró la Corte que la aclaración que se pretende recae efectivamente sobre un apartado que integra la parte resolutiva de la sentencia, pero considera que la misma no es procedente porque no hay una evidente ambigüedad o falta de claridad que haga procedente tal pretensión.

Se RECHAZA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR DE PLANO la solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-147 de 2020, presentada por el señor Edgar Mosquera Gómez, actuando en calidad de apoderado especial de los demandantes y terceros interesados, por las consideraciones expuestas en la presente providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría General, NOTÍFIQUESE lo resuelto en esta providencia al señor Edgar Mosquera Gómez, actuando en calidad de apoderado especial de los demandantes y terceros interesados, y REMÍTASE copia al Juzgado
  3. Primero. Administrativo Oral del Circuito de Quibdó -Chocó.
  4. TERCERO. Contra este auto no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.